FOR THE
SECOND YEAR IN A ROW, a rare
consensus emerged at the Cannes Film Festival. If the 2016 edition will be
remembered for its farcical jury decisions, this year’s official selection
stands a good chance of being barely remembered at all: Rarely does the Cannes
competition, world cinema’s most pedigreed showcase, leave so little of a
collective impression. In stark contrast to the ceremonial merriment of this
seventieth-anniversary year, which occasioned a star-studded Cannes-yearbook
photocall and a gala evening of musical numbers (Isabelle Huppert warbling “Happy Birthday”) and
speeches about the importance of the festival, the mood on the ground was
palpably weary and irritable. Complaining about Cannes is a longstanding
journalistic tradition—André Bazin was in 1955 lamenting the
“ridiculously narrow” entrances that led to “a terrible crush going in and
out”—but this year the grievances were especially loud and sustained. Heightened
security measures (metal detectors and airport-level bag searches at the Palais
des Festivals, soldiers armed with machine guns patrolling the Croisette) meant
jangled nerves, extensive delays, and plenty of time in long lines for
frustrated festivalgoers to grumble, ad nauseam and not without justification,
that this was the weakest Cannes lineup in memory.
Hats off though to Pedro Almodóvar’s
jury for anointing a most deserving—and surprising—Palme d’Or winner in Ruben Östlund’s The Square. Whether peeling back
the brittle surface of Scandinavian liberal democracy (Play) or prodding
the wobbly foundations of the nuclear family (Force Majeure), the
forty-three-year-old Östlund is one of the sharpest and funniest satirists
working today. The Square revolves around the well-heeled,
well-groomed Christian (Claes Bang), a curator at a Stockholm contemporary art
museum where the new exhibit (for which the film is titled) is a demarcated
four-by-four meter zone that announces itself as “a sanctuary of trust and caring.”
That description proves somewhat at odds with the actual public square where
Christian finds himself the victim of a pickpocketing scam that triggers an
overzealous response and then a crisis of conscience. An analytical filmmaker
with a taste for sociological critique, Östlund is sometimes likened to Michael Haneke (more on whom later), but unlike
Haneke, who engineers his scenarios like steel traps, Östlund enjoys scenes
that play out in unpredictable and surreal ways. His manner of implicating the
viewer is less didactic than empathetic, prompting open-ended questions of how
one might react in similar situations, which lent The Square a site-specific mise-en-abyme effect
in Cannes. Not least among its pleasures, Östlund’s wry dismantling of ego and
privilege among the cultural class held up a mirror to the petty self-regard
and herd mentality on routine display at the festival, which can itself
resemble an elaborate behavioral experiment.
The Square is a
film with plenty on its mind, tweaking art-world pretensions and liberal
pieties, exploring the gap between belief and action, contemplating the
relationship between the individual and the collective—all over a 140-minute
duration that some found excessive. (Distended running times were a problem
across the board, likely a factor of rush edits.) The film proceeds in
termite-like fits and starts, constantly revising and complicating its ideas,
veering in tone from jocular to sober and back. All of which made it a
refreshing change from the white elephants—the solemnly respectable prestige
films with clear intentions and predetermined meanings—that more frequently
take festival prizes. Most conspicuous in the latter category this year were
Haneke’s Happy End (the title is ironic) and Andrey
Zvyagintsev’s Loveless (the title is very unironic). Haneke,
a two-time Palme d’Or winner who left Cannes empty-handed for the first time
since 2003’s Time of the Wolf,
is working in a slightly more sardonic register here but Happy End is otherwise business as usual—in
fact, it’s a self-conscious reprise of Haneke’s greatest hits, training its
microscope on an extended bourgeois family in Calais, France, where a refugee
crisis is unfolding under their oblivious noses. No less subtle—and winner of
the third-place jury prize—Loveless is
a handsome, wintry drama about a divorcing couple and their unwanted child that
evolves into an allegory of soul-sick modern Russia.
The
Cannes bubble no longer seems willing or able to keep the real world at bay. A
striking number of films were billed as being “about Europe,” though, needless
to say, some engagements are more meaningful than others. A German woman loses
her Turkish husband and child to a neo-Nazi terrorist attack in Fatih Akin’s In the Fade, a by-the-numbers
study of grief and vengeance that won Diane Kruger the best actress prize. Kornél
Mundruczó’s slick high-concept fantasy Jupiter’s
Moon grants a Syrian refugee
superpowers and Christlike status after he’s pumped full of bullets. But the
film with the most interesting vantage on the new Europe was also the one that
made its geopolitical points most obliquely. Western,
the first feature in over a decade by the talented Valeska
Grisebach (Longing),
is set among a group of German workers who are toiling on a water facility
project in rural Bulgaria. Cast entirely with non-actors, Western is, as the title suggests, a supremely
intelligent rethinking of genre conventions, a gripping culture-clash drama
attuned to new forms of colonialism.
Hailed by almost everyone who saw it as a festival highlight, Western screened in the parallel Un Certain
Regard section, apparently a victim of the unstated yet plain-as-day Cannes
policy to velvet-rope off the main competition exclusively for films with movie
stars. If the competition was especially fatiguing this year, it may have been
for the prevalence of a particular kind of feel-bad film that conjoins formal
stylization with casual sadism, whether in the service of a would-be moral tale
like Yorgos Lanthimos’s The
Killing of a Sacred Deer or a
one-note genre exercise like Lynne Ramsay’s You Were Never Really Here.
No coincidence that the few bright spots were literal signs of
life, works that thrived on a messy vitality. Josh and Benny Safdie’s Good Time, which administered a
needed dose of electroshock therapy to the moribund competition in the home
stretch, is a crime caper with a committed Robert Pattinson performance, a propulsive Oneohtrix
Point Never score, and a nuanced, indeed intersectional, understanding of class
and race. Winner of the runner-up Grand Prix, Robin Campillo’s 120 Beats Per Minute revisits the urgent early-’90s heyday
of ACT-UP in Paris; it’s familiar terrain but brought to life with firsthand
intimacy and a welcome attentiveness to the everyday labor of activism. Yoking
together two New York stories separated by half a century, Wonderstruck, Todd Haynes’s
characteristically personal and lovingly detailed take on a children’s movie,
beautifully inhabits a skewed kid’s-eye perspective (which should come as no
surprise to anyone familiar with his early short Dottie Gets Spanked). It’s also
one of Haynes’s most exuberant demonstrations of his core belief that blatant
artifice can engender overwhelming emotion
Even
from its ivory tower, Cannes could not avoid the film industry’s continued
handwringing and infighting over distribution methods, specifically the
ascendance of streaming services. The inclusion of two high-profile Netflix
productions—Bong Joon Ho’s Okja and Noah Baumbach’s The Meyerowitz Stories (New and
Selected)—dominated the prefestival coverage and the opening jury press
conference (Almodóvar declaring that the Palme should be off-limits to films
that will bypass theatrical exhibition, only to later soften his stance). Facing
a backlash from French theater owners, the festival decreed, even before the
first screening, that from next year on, all films competing at Cannes must
also screen in French cinemas. The embrace of TV, though new to this festival,
was not much of a stretch, given the auteur imprimaturs of Jane Campion (Top
of the Lake: China Girl) and David Lynch (Twin
Peaks: The Return), former Palme d’Or winners and jury presidents, both
reveling in the comparative freedom of serial television; in Lynch’s case, the
first two hours of The Return,
seen on the huge screen of the Grand Theatre Lumiere, were so singular, so
uncompromising, so transporting that they dwarfed everything else in Cannes.
The festival’s most overt gesture toward the future was
Alejandro G. Iñárritu’s Carne
y Arena, its first foray into virtual reality. This seven-minute piece,
drawn on and simulating the experiences of migrants who made the crossing from
Mexico to the US, will soon be on view at the Fondazione Prada in Milan. The
Cannes iteration, limited to one thousand or so visitors, came with an
incongruous (though very Cannes-like) veneer of exclusivity. Eligible guests
were chauffeured a few picturesque miles down the coast to an airplane hangar.
You sign a waiver and wait your turn—partaking of the Perrier and fruit on the
snack table, should you wish—before entering, one at a time, barefoot, a dark
room covered in sand. Donning an Oculus Rift headset and a backpack, two
technicians by your side, you’re granted the illusion of roaming through the
Sonoran Desert, brushing up against the photorealistic avatars of immigrants
who have endured this very journey. (Move into them and you see their beating
hearts.) Before long, a helicopter beam blinds you, and border agents arrive,
barking orders and pointing their rifles in your face. The widespread (and
widely challenged) notion of virtual reality as “empathy machine”—as evident in
the proliferation of consciousness-raising, humanitarian-themed VR works—merges
here with Iñárritu’s shock-and-awe sensibility to create something at once
brutalizing and trivializing, rife with irony and ripe for precisely the kind
of satire that won the Palme d’Or. Indeed the whole thing might have been
devised by the well-intentioned, tone-deaf culturati of The Square, an invitation to get
under the skins of actual refugees that was also among the most cossetted
experiences available in Cannes.
No comments:
Post a Comment